Notability · Article creation · Corrections · Monitoring

Your company, on the record.

The page that answers for you when you're not in the room.

Wikipedia is where search panels and AI assistants go for the facts about your company. We research, source and write the article that belongs there — and keep it accurate once it is live.

Start a project What's included

Typical timeline: 3–8 weeks to submission
Starts with: A notability assessment
Scope: Creation, corrections, monitoring
Disclosure: Paid role, declared up front

01 — The brief

What this actually is.

Search your company and Wikipedia sits near the top — and it is increasingly what the search panel and the AI answer are quoting underneath. That makes it the one page about your business you cannot simply write yourself, which is exactly why it is worth getting right. The article that lasts is the one built the way the encyclopedia works: independent coverage gathered first, a neutral draft that reads like an encyclopedia entry instead of a brochure, our paid role declared up front, and changes put to the editors rather than pushed past them. Done that way it stops being something you check nervously and becomes a permanent, third-party account of your company that outranks nearly everything else you own.

You probably need this if

A previous attempt at your article was deleted, or never cleared review
Your page carries a banner warning that it reads like an advertisement
The ownership, leadership and headcount on it stopped being true years ago
Every competitor in your sector has an article and you have none
Someone on your team edited the page and was reverted within the hour

02 — What's included

Everything that lands in the engagement.

A straight answer before you spend

We check whether the independent coverage exists to sustain an article before you commit to one. If it is not there yet, you hear it in the first week rather than the third month.

A source file that does the arguing

Independent references found, read and mapped claim by claim — press, trade titles, books, filings. On Wikipedia the sources are the case; everything else is formatting.

An article written to last

Neutral, encyclopedic and structured like the strongest pages in your sector, then submitted for review so it goes live approved rather than contested.

Corrections that stick

Outdated ownership, the wrong founders, a figure from three funding rounds ago — raised as sourced requests and seen through until the page matches reality.

Editors on your side

We say who we work for and make the case on the talk page. Volunteers are far more receptive to a sourced request than an anonymous rewrite — which is why our changes get accepted.

Monitoring once it is live

Pages get vandalised, edited and quietly reworded. We watch yours and act when something inaccurate lands, so you are not the last to find out.

03 — How we run it

The order we work in.

Assess notability

We audit the coverage that already exists against the bar Wikipedia actually applies. You get a yes, a no, or a list of what would have to exist first.

Build the source base

Independent, reliable references gathered and organised sentence by sentence, because every line on the page has to trace back to one.

Draft in Wikipedia's voice

Neutral point of view, no marketing language, structured like comparable articles. Promotional tone is the fastest route to deletion.

Declare & submit

Our paid role declared, then the draft filed for review or the fix raised as a sourced talk-page request. Editors decide — which is why the case gets built properly first.

Answer & watch

Reviewer feedback addressed, the draft revised, and the published page monitored afterwards for vandalism and inaccurate edits.

04 — What changes

What you're left holding.

The version of your company that search panels and AI assistants quote
An article that holds its place instead of quietly disappearing
Facts about you that stay current — and stay watched

What we work in

Articles for Creation
Talk-page edit requests
Notability & reliable-source guidelines
Paid-contribution disclosure
Wikidata
Watchlists & page monitoring

05 — Questions

The ones people actually ask.

Is paying someone to edit Wikipedia allowed?

Yes, with disclosure. Wikimedia's Terms of Use permit paid contributions as long as the paid relationship is declared, which we do on the account and in every edit summary. Undisclosed editing from anonymous accounts is the part that goes wrong — and declaring it is not just the rule, it is what gets our edits taken seriously by the people reviewing them.

Can you guarantee the page stays up?

No, and nobody honestly can — volunteer editors decide what stays. What we can do is tell you whether the coverage exists to support an article before you spend anything, and then build the strongest version of that case. That is the whole difference between a page that gets challenged and one that simply sits there doing its job.

What if my business is not notable enough?

Then we tell you early and you keep your budget. Notability comes from significant coverage in independent sources you did not commission — not from revenue, headcount or reputation. Where it is borderline we set out what would need to exist, and you can revisit it later.

Can you remove something negative?

Where it is inaccurate or badly sourced, yes — we raise it with editors and it usually comes out. Well-sourced criticism stays, and attempts to scrub it tend to attract more of it. Where an entry is simply unflattering but fair, the better play is a complete, well-sourced article around it, so one line is read in the context of the whole company.

The other six

Let's multiply.

Tell us where your business is today. We'll show you the X — the point where the right website, the right visibility and the right outreach cross into growth.

Start your project

Or write to us directly — hello@digitzx.com